Hi all! I guess I'm a bit presumptuous saying "all"... I'm not sure anyone is actually following this blog. Ha!
Today, we discussed Student Learning Support. Jane Nueberger, President-Elect of NADE, lead the seminar. [Some of you may remember Jane since she also spoke at the DEAM Conference in May.]
Interesting tid-bit: Supplemental Instruction (peer tutoring) has been proven to increase learning, retention, academic success. "Historically difficult" classes can benefit from this.
Historically difficult= "gatekeeper" class where 30% or more receive a D, W, or F (in FCC's case a Z, W, or U grade).
Our EN50A falls into this category (60% pass rate 5/yr. average). Maybe creating a cadre of successful EN50A students as peer tutors that work with our 50A students (in and out of class) may just help. That could be a nice "pilot" program somewhere down the line.
More to come soon.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
Amy Sedaris
This is more of a tweet than a blog post, but it's the end of a long week. I'm going to see comedian Amy Sedaris tonight on campus here in Boone. She should be funny...well, hopefully as funny as her brother, David (saw him in at Weinberg Theater in Frederick last year).
I'll write more in the days to come.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Zen Master
Good day today. Worked out early this morning. Attended class sessions where we discussed the results of our Canfield Learning Styles Inventory...I'm an Independent/Conceptual learner (I like to work on my own-at least initially-and I like structure to my learning environment).
Spent some time with my Special Interest Group; we're investigating how to bridge the gap between the highest level developmental writing courses and entry-level transfer courses (i.e. EN 101). Some interesting questions arose: "What are the basic competencies that EN 101 teachers expect EN 50A students to have when starting EN 101? Are these the same expectations they have of students who enter their classes via a passing Accuplacer score?" Hmmm.
I visited with my practicum advisor, Dr. Rob Sanders. I'm trying to shape my practicum prospectus. Looks like mine will be more research-based than practice-based for the time being; I'll be researching effective exit exam processes and hopefully be able to make some recommendations to our department in a year's time. I'll get into that more in the future.
Oh, and I went to yoga tonight for the first time in many, many years. It was great!
I miss my wife and kids, but I'll be smarter and in the best shape of my life when I return.
Namaste.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Digital Storytelling
I just went to a really cool seminar on "Digital Storytelling." Digital storytelling uses Adobe Photoshop and Premiere Elements to convey short (3 1/2 minute) visual narratives. Students write a 375 narrative (or condense a longer version) and record a reading of it, collect images, edit photos, and assemble sound/music and graphics. Still photos, film clips, and other media can be used.
This concept can be used for students in developmental and transfer-level writing courses (I envision it as value-added component for EN 101!), and does not have to be a narrative. Digital creations can focus on practically anything. This seminar focused on personal, historical, natural, social, and culture topics, but that doesn't mean other modes cannot be explored through digital technology.
Brian and Kelly, I know you have more technical expertise than I do, and I won't bore all of you with the details, but feel free to drop me a line if you have questions (copyright, technical, methods...). The facilitator of the seminar handed out comprehensive information and helpful step-by-step procedures.
Check out this website to see more: www.cvcc.edu/digital_storytelling
This concept can be used for students in developmental and transfer-level writing courses (I envision it as value-added component for EN 101!), and does not have to be a narrative. Digital creations can focus on practically anything. This seminar focused on personal, historical, natural, social, and culture topics, but that doesn't mean other modes cannot be explored through digital technology.
Brian and Kelly, I know you have more technical expertise than I do, and I won't bore all of you with the details, but feel free to drop me a line if you have questions (copyright, technical, methods...). The facilitator of the seminar handed out comprehensive information and helpful step-by-step procedures.
Check out this website to see more: www.cvcc.edu/digital_storytelling
Some Substantial Stuff From Week 1
Here is some interesting information from the first week (assessment/placement):
1. The results of student assessment/placement tests (ex. Accuplacer) are designed to be implemented using a RANGE of scores rather than one cut score. Currently, FCC uses 90 as the cut score apparently because there is a "formal agreement" by community colleges statewide. After a little investigation I found out: a) MD communitiy colleges are wise to publish one cut score to students to avoid confusion, b) the 90 cut score in MD was determined as a "bench mark" not a hard-and-fast rule, c) therefore, many MD community colleges do not use one cut score to determine placement, and d) since we don't have common courses or course design in developmental classes and EN 101/102, it makes sense that we tailor our assessment needs.
2. The Accuplacer should not be considered a perfect assessment method. It is valid and reliable, but the standard error of measurement is highest for students who score in the "gray area" (just below or above the score that would place them EN 101)--and those are the students we are most trying to serve! Using a range is one helpful way to address this, but other means are necessary. Here are the important factors in making placement decisions (priority order):
1. Placement test scores--if a student scored in the gray area for the Accuplacer sentence skills area, consider looking at how a student scored in the Accuplacer reading portion to help determine placement. Aim for a consistency of scores.
2. Other available test information--our in-house essay exam* &/or SAT/ACT tests can help (although the latter are aptitude tests not assessment tests; they are not as valid and reliable as assessment tests). We can use SAT /ACT data to help with placement, not just to determine who is exempt from taking the placement tests.
3. High school background data--high school rank (%/tier in class) being the most effective, courses completed and GPA are less reliable data
4. Age/maturity--older students may be more committed, younger students tend to over-estimate their abilities.
5. Student opinion--not necessarily self-placement, use only if other data is unavailable
6. Additional testing
*Grading of in-house essay exams was discussed, and I can share some of that information at a later date. Just a peek: most research supports using a 6-point scale rubric that is cross-graded. Oh, joy.
1. The results of student assessment/placement tests (ex. Accuplacer) are designed to be implemented using a RANGE of scores rather than one cut score. Currently, FCC uses 90 as the cut score apparently because there is a "formal agreement" by community colleges statewide. After a little investigation I found out: a) MD communitiy colleges are wise to publish one cut score to students to avoid confusion, b) the 90 cut score in MD was determined as a "bench mark" not a hard-and-fast rule, c) therefore, many MD community colleges do not use one cut score to determine placement, and d) since we don't have common courses or course design in developmental classes and EN 101/102, it makes sense that we tailor our assessment needs.
2. The Accuplacer should not be considered a perfect assessment method. It is valid and reliable, but the standard error of measurement is highest for students who score in the "gray area" (just below or above the score that would place them EN 101)--and those are the students we are most trying to serve! Using a range is one helpful way to address this, but other means are necessary. Here are the important factors in making placement decisions (priority order):
1. Placement test scores--if a student scored in the gray area for the Accuplacer sentence skills area, consider looking at how a student scored in the Accuplacer reading portion to help determine placement. Aim for a consistency of scores.
2. Other available test information--our in-house essay exam* &/or SAT/ACT tests can help (although the latter are aptitude tests not assessment tests; they are not as valid and reliable as assessment tests). We can use SAT /ACT data to help with placement, not just to determine who is exempt from taking the placement tests.
3. High school background data--high school rank (%/tier in class) being the most effective, courses completed and GPA are less reliable data
4. Age/maturity--older students may be more committed, younger students tend to over-estimate their abilities.
5. Student opinion--not necessarily self-placement, use only if other data is unavailable
6. Additional testing
*Grading of in-house essay exams was discussed, and I can share some of that information at a later date. Just a peek: most research supports using a 6-point scale rubric that is cross-graded. Oh, joy.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Week 1 Wrap-Up
Week 1 ended and here's the Top-5 List (in the future, I'll try to post more now that I have this blog up and running):
5. Dorm life isn't horrible, even for a quasi-germaphobe. The same rules apply to a dorm room as a hotel room: don't walk around barefoot, Lysol disinfectant is your best friend, ignore the smells (stale beer and sweat in the case of room 143) of the previous tenants.
4. Campus food isn't horrible. I've never been a "foodie," but cafeteria food ain't so bad. I think it was Groucho Marx that said, "The food at this restaurant is horrible. And, the portions are too small."
3. It's nice being a student again ("officially")!
2. I have realized that teachers become just like their students when the roles are reversed. Case and point: wanting access to cell phones in the classroom.
1. They call "dorms" "residence halls" now, but the old rule of "no open beer containers" is still applicable.
I'll write more later about some substantial things we have discussed and found out so far at the institute.
Until then...
5. Dorm life isn't horrible, even for a quasi-germaphobe. The same rules apply to a dorm room as a hotel room: don't walk around barefoot, Lysol disinfectant is your best friend, ignore the smells (stale beer and sweat in the case of room 143) of the previous tenants.
4. Campus food isn't horrible. I've never been a "foodie," but cafeteria food ain't so bad. I think it was Groucho Marx that said, "The food at this restaurant is horrible. And, the portions are too small."
3. It's nice being a student again ("officially")!
2. I have realized that teachers become just like their students when the roles are reversed. Case and point: wanting access to cell phones in the classroom.
1. They call "dorms" "residence halls" now, but the old rule of "no open beer containers" is still applicable.
I'll write more later about some substantial things we have discussed and found out so far at the institute.
Until then...
Friday, July 2, 2010
Hello from the Kellogg Institute!
Hi everyone,
Thanks for reading my blog. I decided to start a blog while I'm here at the Kellogg Institute in Boone, NC. Basically, I'll journal a bit about dorm life, rap about what's going on here, and reflect on some of the interesting and important things I'm learning.
Thanks for reading my blog. I decided to start a blog while I'm here at the Kellogg Institute in Boone, NC. Basically, I'll journal a bit about dorm life, rap about what's going on here, and reflect on some of the interesting and important things I'm learning.
In case you're wondering, the Kellogg Institute is not run by Tony the Tiger and has no connection to the cereal company. As evidence of this, I'm scarfing down a bowl of Post's Honey Bunches of Oats right now in my dorm room, and there is no sign of the cereal police.
The Kellogg Institute is a 4-week intensive graduate program that is coordinated by the National Center for Developmental Education--which is housed on the remote and hilly campus of Appalachian State University. The 37 Kellogg fellows are made up of developmental math, writing, and reading teachers from 2-year and 4-year colleges. There are even some program coordinators and adminstrators here.
There are 4, one-week sessions: Assessment & Placement, Designing Learning Environments, Academic Support Services & Leadership, and Outcomes Assessment & Program Evaluation. Also, each of us is working on a practicum project that we will carry out at our home colleges when we return. I'm hoping to investigate our EN 50A exit exam process and procedures.
Talk to you all soon.
-Joe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)